Nadi literature can appear confusing when the same or similar Nadi names are transliterated differently across books, articles, software, or manuscripts. Small spelling differences can make comparison difficult even when two sources are discussing the same division.
For a 150-Amsa reference, consistency is therefore important. Choose a master list and preserve the exact spelling throughout your notes. If another source uses a variant, record it as an alternative rather than silently replacing the original.
The same principle applies to the degree boundaries used for the Amsas. A name alone is not enough to establish that two systems are identical. The underlying calculation should also be compared.
This may seem like a minor editorial issue, but it becomes crucial when building software, tables, or searchable archives. A consistent naming system makes research much easier and prevents accidental duplication.
The best practice is simple: preserve the source wording, document variants, and clearly state which calculation model your study uses.